( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the order of the Additional District magistrate Allahabad dated 31-10-1955 acquitting the six respondents of the offence under section 7 of the Indian Copyright Act III of 1914.

( 2 ) THE facts which led to the prosecution of the respondents are these. Messrs Law Book company is a firm of publishers who have specialised in the publication of legal literature. The six respondents are the partners o this firm. Sri J. N. Bagga, respondent No. 1 is the Manager. It appears that they also published reprints of various Acts passed by the Central Legislature. In 1952 they received a communication from the Government of India objecting to the publication of "bare texts of a number of Central Acts" by this firm. The letter pointed out that in doing so the firm was infringing the provisions of Section 18 of the Copyright Act of 1914. It also directed the firm to stop forthwith the sale and distribution of these publications, to surrender to the Government of India the profits which the firm might have made by the publication and distribution of these Acts, and to apologise unconditionally to the Government for the infringement of their copyright. The letter contained a threat that failure to carry out the directions contained in the letter would result in criminal proceedings against them. The manager or the firm sent a long reply in which he denied that the firm had committed any breach of copyright. Thereupon a complaint was made by Mr. P. C. Saxena, the then Additional District magistrate, Allahabad, before the City Magistrate, Allahabad, alleging that the firm had published a reprint of the General Clauses Act (Act X of 1897) and had thereby rendered itself liable to punishment under Section 7 of the Indian Copyright (Act III of 1914 ).

( 3 ) ON behalf of the respondents the publication of the aforesaid Act was admitted but it was. pleaded in defence that no permission was required from the Government for publishing it and that no offence had been committed by the firm. The firm also produced before the court in support of this contention a copy of the resolution of the Government of India purporting to give general permission to any one to publish the Acts of the Indian Legislature subject to certain conditions This is notification No. A-637 dated 22-11-1926, which was published first in the government of Indias Gazette and republished in the United pro-vices Gazette dated 18-12-1926. It is necessary to quote this notification verbatim: "no. A-637 Under the provisions of the Indian Copyright Act, 1914, copyright in Government publication vests in the Crown, and any reproduc- tion, without consent of a work first published by Government ordinarily constitutes an infringe-ment of copyright. The Government of India consider it desirable that the public should be at liberty to reproduce certain Government publications, and they are pleased to grant general permission to reproduce. (a) Any matter which has appeared in the Gazette of India except, (i) Acts of the Indian legislature, (ii) Matter not first published by the Government of India; (b) Acts of the Indian Legislature, subject to the condition that these are reproduced together with original material, e. g. , commentaries; (c) Vernacular translations of Acts of the Indian Legislature; (d) Reports of any Committee appointed by the Government of India or the Indian Legislature, (2) Permission to reproduce other Government publications will be given in special circumstances. Applications for permission should be forwarded to the Surveyor-General in the case of maps, charts, plans and other documents published by or on behalf of the Survey of India and to the Secretary to the Government of India in the Department of Industries and Labour in all other cases. (3) In the case of works first published by local Government application for permission to reproduce such works should be made, in the absence of any sp