SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 6

V.BHARGAVA
SUNDAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
LACHMAN DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.R.Avasthi, Ram Lal Anand

V. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision arises out of proceedings under the Displaced Persons Debts Adjustment Act 70 of 1951. When this revision, cattle up for hearing, a question first arose as to whether such a revision did at all He to this Court under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The jurisdiction to deal with proceedings under that Act 70 of 1951 is vested in Tribunal and not in civil Courts. Under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the High Court can call for the record of any case which has been decided by any court subordinate to such a High Court. Section 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure lays down what courts are courts subordinate to the high Court for the purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure. That section is to the following effect:-"for the purposes of this Code, the District Court is subordinate to the High Court, and every civil Court of a grade inferior to that of a District Court and every Court of Small Causes is subordinate to the High Court and District Court. "

( 2 ) A Tribunal exercising powers under Act, 70 of 1951 is neither a district court nor a civil court or a court of small causes. Consequently, such a Tribunal is not a court subord





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top