SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Mukerji, J.
RAI KRISHAN SARAN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. - Respondents
Civil Misc. Writ 86 Of 1956
Decided On : 02/01/1957

Advocates Appeared:
P.N.Varma

Headnote:

FERRY RIGHTS - PRIVATE FERRY - U. P. ZAMINDARI ABOLITION AND LAND REFORMS ACT, 1950 - SECTION 6 - RIGHT TO OPERATE FERRY NOT AN INTERMEDIARY RIGHT - NOT VESTED IN STATE.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners claimed a private ferry right under a Sanad granted by Warren Hastings in 1781. After the abolition of zamindaris, respondents considered the ferry rights vested in Gram Samaj respondents. Petitioners challenged the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer directing the Gram Samaj to take over the ferry service.

Finding of the Court:

The grant conferred only the right to run the ferry, not any rights in land. The East India Company had the right to farm revenues and grant the right to maintain a ferry. The right to a ferry can be exercised irrespective of any rights in land. The petitioners' right was not an intermediary right and thus not vested in the State under Section 6 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.

Issues: 1. Whether the grant conferred a right to own and maintain a ferry or only the right to run the ferry? 2. Whether the East India Company had the right to make such a grant? 3. Whether the petitioners' right was an intermediary right and thus vested in the State under Section 6 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The grant conferred only the right to run the ferry, not any rights in land. 2. The East India Company had the right to farm revenues and grant the right to maintain a ferry. 3. The petitioners' right was not an intermediary right and thus not vested in the State under Section 6 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act.

Final Decision: Petition allowed. Order of the Sub-Divisional Officer quashed. Direction issued to respondents not to interfere with petitioners' right to maintain and operate the ferry.

MUKERJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition by six persons under Article 226 of the Constitution against five named respondents; the respondents to the petition are (1) The State of Uttar Pradesh, (2) The sub-Divisional Officer, Chunar, District Mirzapur, (3) Gram Samaj, Jalalpur, District Mirzapur, (4) Gram Samaj, Arazi Sultanpur, District Mirzapur, and (5) Gram Samaj, Aibakpur Muhana, district Mirzapur. The prayers that have been made by the petitioners are these: (a) that a writ of certiorari or other direction or order may be issued quashing the order dated the 24th of November 1955, passed by respondent No. 2; and (b) that a writ of prohibition, or other direction or order as the Court may deem fit be issued restraining the respondents from interfering in any way with the rights of the petitioners to the ferry situate at village Arazi Lain, Sultanpur, District Mirzapur. The petitioners also claimed an ad interim injunction, which, it may be pointed out, was granted to the petitioners by an order of this Court dated the 18th of January, 1956.

( 2 ) THE facts on which this petition has been founded briefly stated were these: the petitioners owned a private ferry which operated across the river Ganges at village Arazi lain Sultanpur in the district of Mirzapur. The petitioners derived their rights to this ferry under a Sanad granted by Warren Hastings sometimes in the year 1781. The petitioners contended that they had been operating this ferry without let or hindrance ever since that day. After the abolition of zamindaris on the passing of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, and after the making of the Vesting Order the respondents considered that the rights which the petitioners enjoyed in the ferry got vested in the three Gram Samaj respondents, namely, respondents Nos. 3 to 5. A Notification No. 241/1-A-1730-53, dated 13th February 1954, was issued by respondent No. 1 under which all private ferries, other than those mentioned in Schedule I attaching to that notification were made to vest in the State because of an earlier Notification, No. 4094/1-A-450-51, dated 1st July 1952, which Notification had been issued under Sub-section (1)of Section 4 of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act (Act I of 1951 ). On the 24th of November 1955, an order was made by the Sub-Divisional Officer of Chunar, Mirzapur, in the following terms:--

tahsildar Chunar, Please inform the President, Land Management Committee, to take over possession of the ferry service and report if it has been done. Sd/- S. N. Pandey. "

The aforementioned order had the effect, if not set aside, of depriving the petitioners of the right which they claimed in respect of the ferry in dispute.

( 3 ) BEFORE coming to notice the respective contentions advanced by the parties before me, I should like to state some of the uncontroverted facts, which have appeared either on the affidavits or on the documents filed as Annexures to those affidavits. The rights which the petitioners claimed in this ferry originated in a grant which appears to have been made by warren Hastings as far back as the 5th of Zilhij in the 26th Year of the reign pf Shah Alam: according to one computation this date would fall sometime between April and June, 1788 of the georgian Calendar. A copy of the original grant is to be found at p. 211 of Vol. VIII of Duncan records for the year 1788. This Record was produced before me by the Standing Counsel after obtaining it from the Keeper of Government Records. The grant was described as ultaghma Jageer and the properties covered by that grant were mentioned in a schedule appended at the end of the grant. Four villages, namely, Sultanpur, majidpur, Kusapur and Mujeear, were granted and the fifth item granted was mahal of the sultanpur Ferry. The grant was to take effect from Khris of 1189 Fasli. It appears that during the troublous times of the Mutiny military officers stationed at Sultanpur or near about that place interfe











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top