SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 109

MUKERJI, CHOWDHRY
SUNDER – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.H.BEG, P.C.Chaturvedi, S.C.Asthna

CHOWDHRY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by five persons: Sundar aged 30, Pachchu aged 70 or 75 (65 according to the sessions Judge), Radhurai aged 30, Sukhlal aged 40 or 45 and Gajraj aged 20 or 21 (25 according to the Sessions Judgej. The learned Sessions Judge of Fatehpur has convicted all of them under Section 302, read with Section 149 or alternatively, with section 34, I. P, C. , and sentenced Sundar and Pachchu to death and each of the remaining three to imprisonment for life. He has passed a separate sentence of imprisonment for life on Raghurai under Section 302, read with Section 114, I. P. C. He has also convicted all of them of rioting and sentenced Sundar and Pachchu to 2 years R. I. each under Section 148, I. P. C. , and Raghurai, Sukhlal and Gajraj to 18 months R. I. each under section 147, I. P. C. The learned Sessions Judge has said nothing as to whether the sentences of those not awarded capital punishment were to run concurrently or consecutively. The record is also before us for confirmation of the sentences of death passed on Sundar and Pachchu.

( 2 ) SUNDAR belongs to Semra, Pachchu and Raghurai to Dehuli, Sukhlal to Sachauli and Gajraj to kamalipur, all within po



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top