SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 105

DESAI, BEG
TEJ BAHADUR – Appellant
Versus
PEARELAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JANARDAN SARUP GUPTA

DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an order of our brother Sri Narain Salmi refusing to issue a certificate to the appellant for the refund of court-fee.

( 2 ) THE appellant filed a second appeal in this Court and paid ad valorem court-fee amounting to rs. 142/8/- on it; that was the proper amount of court-fee payable on the memo of appeal. No second appeal lay and the appeal would have been dismissed but for the request of the appellant that it might be treated as an application in revision under Section 115 C. P. C. , which request was granted, on an application for revision less court-fee was payable than had been paid by the appellant; consequently he made an application purporting to be "an application under Section 151, C. P. C. , in Civil Revision No. 1140, of 1953" praying for refund of the excess amount of court-fee. The application was dismissed by our learned brother who was not satisfied that any case had been made out for refund. This special appeal has been filed under Chapter VIII, Rule 5 of Rules of Court.


( 3 ) UNDER Chap. VIII, Rule 5 an appeal lies from a judgment which is not an order made in the exercise of revisional jurisdiction of one Judge. The first qu





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top