SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 104

RANDHIR SINGH, V.D.BHARGAVA
KARAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NIHAL KHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AKHTAR HUSSAIN, B.N.ROY


RANDHIR SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal pending in the court of the District Judge Bahraich, has been withdrawn by an order of this Court under Article 228 of the Constitution for determination of the question whether Section 3 of U. P. Act XV of 1952, and Section 3 of U. P. Act XXXI of 1952 are valid.

( 2 ) IT appears that the applicant No. 1 Karam Singh obtained a lease from applicant No. 2 Sardar karam Singh in respect of some plots of land with an aggregate area of Section 273 acres on 15-4-1952. This land was entered, according to the allegations of the applicants, as Khudkasht of applicant no. 2 in the papers. On 29-7-1952 after the vesting, a suit wag instituted by applicant no. 1 against opposite party No. 1 for the possession of two plots of land Nos. 1112/2 and 1115/1 on the allegations that opposite party No. 1 was in wrongful possession of these plots of land, which had been leased out to the applicant No. 1 by the applicant No. 2, who was before the vesting the landlord of the land in dispute.

( 3 ) THE suit was resisted by opposite party No. 1 on two grounds. Firstly, it was alleged that opposite party No. 1 had been in possession of the land since 1947 and was in-actual













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top