SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 98

RANDHIR SINGH, V.BHARGAVA
RATAN LAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DHAON, B.N.ROY, N.Banerjee, UMA SHANKAR SRIVASTAVA

RANDHIR SINGH, J, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a special appeal from an order of a learned single Judge (in this case the Honble the. Chief Justice) dismissing a petition for a writ made under Article 226 of the Constitution.

( 2 ) IT appears that the applicants father was one of the many applicants for grant of a permit for plying a stage carriage on the Muzaffarnagar-Bhopa-Bhakerheri route. The application for a permit made by Munna Lal was, however, not granted and a permit was granted to another man, munna Lal then went up in appeal to the State Transport Authority. During the pendency of the appeal, however, Munna Lal expired and the appellant made an application for the substitution of his name in place of his deceased father. This application was rejected and the applicant filed the writ petition which was dismissed and which is now the subject-matter of the special appeal.

( 3 ) ORIGINALLY there were two vacancies on the Muzarfarnagar-Bhopa-Bhokerheri route. At the time when the appeal was filed by Munna Lal against the refusal of a permit to him only one of the vacancies had been filled up. Subsequently, however, the other vacancy was also filled up and a permit was granted to Qadam Si





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top