IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Mehrotra, J.
LACHHMI NARAIN - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - Respondents
Civil Misc. 172 Of 1957
Decided On : 05/09/1957
LAND ACQUISITION - Notification under Section 4 and 6 - Validity - Declaration under Section 17 (4) - Opinion of State Government - Arbitrariness - Direction to take possession under Section 17 (1) - Specification of waste and arable land - Collector's power to take possession.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioners challenged the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, claiming that the land was not waste or arable land and that the declaration under Section 17 (4) was invalid. They also sought a writ of mandamus to restrain the authorities from dispossessing them from the land.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that the notification under Section 4 was not invalid merely because it did not specify the portion of the land that was waste or arable. The declaration under Section 17 (4) was also not arbitrary or unreasonable. However, the Court directed the Collector to specify the portion of the land that was waste and arable before taking possession under the direction issued in the notification of 27th December 1956.
Issues: 1. Whether the notification under Section 4 was invalid for not specifying the portion of the land that was waste or arable? 2. Whether the declaration under Section 17 (4) was arbitrary or unreasonable? 3. Whether the Collector could take possession of the entire land without specifying the portion that was waste and arable?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The notification under Section 4 need not specify the portion of the land that is waste or arable. 2. The opinion of the State Government under Section 17 (4) is final and cannot be challenged unless it is arbitrary or unreasonable. 3. The Collector can only take possession of the waste and arable land after specifying the portion that falls under this category.
Final Decision: The petition was rejected insofar as it sought to quash the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act. However, the Court directed the Collector not to take possession of the entire land without specifying the portion that was waste and arable.
( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of certiorari be issued quashing the notifications issued under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act and further for a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to give effect to the said notifications and refrain from dispossessing the petitioners from the land in dispute.
( 2 ) BRIEFLY the facts are that on the 14th of December 1956, a notification purporting to be one under Section 4 (1) of the Land Acquisition Act was issued for general information that the disputed land was needed for public purpose and that the provisions of Section 17 (1) of the said act applied and that the provisions of Section 5-A of the said Act would not apply to these proceedings. Thereafter another notification dated the 27th of December 1956, was issued under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act giving out that the laird was needed for public purpose and the Collector of Bulandshahr was directed to take orders for the acquisition o the said land. It was further provided in the notification that as the case was one of urgency the Collector was directed on the expiry of the notice to take possession of any waste or arable land forming part of the land measuring 47. 5 acres situated in Khurja, belonging to the petitioners as tenants, for the alleged construction oi an Engineering Institute. The land in dispute is plot No. 1551 measuring 52 acres, Mohal Baqi Mada at Qasba Khurja, district Bulandshahr, and was known as bhura parao Sarkari. It was declared surlpus from military needs and was let out in 1939 to Lachhmi Narain, petitioner, and Sri Krishna Gopal, father of petitioners Nos. 2 and 3, under a registered lease deed dated the 9th of June 1939 to the extent of 48 acres and 24 polies for thirty years for cultivation etc. , on a rent of Rs. 550 per year and about four acres of land to the J. A. S. High school, Khurja, on lease on a rent of Rs. 50 per annum. It is asserted by the petitioners that due to some personal enmity between the petitioners and one Sri Din Dayal, M. L. A. , the District magistrate was forced by the said M. L. A. to issue a notice dated the 25th October 1955 to the petitioners to quit the land. As against that order a writ petition No. 1254 of 1955 was filed in this Court. That writ petition was withdrawn on some undertaking being given by the Standing Counsel. Another notice dated the 19th of June 1958 was issued by the Collector requiring the petitioners to deliver possession of the entire land to the Tehsildar. Thereafter a writ petition No. 1384 of 1956 was filed in this court. The petitioners contention was that they were hereditary tenants of the land and that the land could not be resumed and that without filing a suit they could not be ejected by the executive orders. The writ petition was, however, rejected on the 12th of November 1956. A special Appeal against that order was also rejected on the 29th of November 1956. Thereafter these land acquisition proceedings were taken for the acquisition of the piece of land which is in the possession of the petitioners. In para. 11 of the affidavit filed in support of the petition it is asserted that the petitioners are still in possession of the land in dispute and the land contains residential houses, servant quarters and cattle-sheds, etc. , which are mostly pucca buildings of considerable value, including tubewell, pucca drainage and other constructions. It also contains a large number of fruit bearing and timber trees planted by the petitioners on the land which constitute grove as defined in the Tenancy Act, and these constructions and trees constituting grove are spread over the land in dispute and in acquisition of 47. 5 acres land all of them would be lost to the petitioners. It is further alleged in the affidavit that there are about four acres of land of this plot which had already been vacated by the school to which it was let out and it is already at the dispos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.