SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 147

V.D.BHARGAVA
BRIJ BHUSAN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LUCKNOW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.J.Fanthome, B.K.DHAON, B.N.ROY

V. D. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Aticle 226 of the Constitution filed by one Brij Bhushan Pande against the Transport Authority, U. P. and the Regional Transport Authority in the Gorakhpur Region.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the petitioner has been plying a stage carriage since 1942 on the ballia Bansdith-Manior Sisota route. As was the custom from the year 1940 (sic) he was given a temporary permit for three years at a time. After the decision of the Full Bench case, Moti Lal v. Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1951 All 257 (A), the petitioner also made an application for renewal of his permit. His allegation is that from the year 1942 till 5th December 1950 there has been no conviction against him. From the 5th December 1950 to the 4th December 1953 he plied his bus on the above route and he was never convicted of any offence under the Motor Vehicles Act nor any strictures were passed by any court against him and there were no adverse endorsements on the permit or on the licence. He applied for the renewal of the permit on the 12th October 1953 which was duly published in the Government gazette under Section 57. Sub-clause (3) of the motor V














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top