V.D.BHARGAVA
BRIJ BHUSAN PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, LUCKNOW – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Aticle 226 of the Constitution filed by one Brij Bhushan Pande against the Transport Authority, U. P. and the Regional Transport Authority in the Gorakhpur Region.
( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the petitioner has been plying a stage carriage since 1942 on the ballia Bansdith-Manior Sisota route. As was the custom from the year 1940 (sic) he was given a temporary permit for three years at a time. After the decision of the Full Bench case, Moti Lal v. Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1951 All 257 (A), the petitioner also made an application for renewal of his permit. His allegation is that from the year 1942 till 5th December 1950 there has been no conviction against him. From the 5th December 1950 to the 4th December 1953 he plied his bus on the above route and he was never convicted of any offence under the Motor Vehicles Act nor any strictures were passed by any court against him and there were no adverse endorsements on the permit or on the licence. He applied for the renewal of the permit on the 12th October 1953 which was duly published in the Government gazette under Section 57. Sub-clause (3) of the motor V
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.