SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 192

MEHROTRA
BABULAL – Appellant
Versus
G. S. HASHMI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.B.ASTHANA, V.K.S.Chaudhary

MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of prohibition restraining the Tehsildar of Mau, opposite party No. 1, from proceeding further with the proceedings, under Rule 115-C, U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules.

( 2 ) BEFORE the abolition of the zamindari, the petitioner asserts that he was a co-sharer in patti No. 10 of village Khor, pargana Mau, district Banda, in which plot No. 251/1 measuring an area of 53 bighas and 3 biswas is situate. According to the petitioners assertion in the affidavit it was cleared and brought under cultivation in 1358-F. and since then he has been cultivating it. Near about 6th of November, 1956 a registered letter purporting to be on behalf of apposite parties Nog. 2 to 14 was sent to the Tahsildar of Mau complaining against Sri Ansdhari, Pradhan of the Gaon Sabha. A similar letter was sent to the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Karvi, and that was sent by him to the Tahsildar of Mau. Thereupon a notice under Rule 115-D of the U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Rules was issued against the petitioner requiring him to file an objection in his Court on 4th of April, 1956. These proc





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top