SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 220

MEHROTRA
ALI HAMZA OSMANY – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT CUSTODIAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
RAMA SHANKER PRASAD, S.S.DHAVAN

MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a writ of prohibition directing the opposite party No. 1, the Assistant Custodian (Judicial), Azamgarh, from proceeding further with the case No. 1161/220 of 1955. The facts are not disputed in this case.

( 2 ) THE point which has been raised by the learned counsel in this petition is a pure question of law. The applicants are the sons of late Khan Bahadur Mohammad Ali Ausat, who died on the 17tn of January 1952, leaving behind the applicants and one Ali Irtiza Osmany as his three sons and Mst. Shamsunnisa and Mst. Akhtari as his two daughters. Mst. Shamshunnisa is married to one Ali Haider Usmani who migrated to Pakistan in 1949 and is now settled ia the district of mianwali in West Punjab. Mst. Shamshunnisa left for Mianwali in 1952 and is now living there with her husband. The father of the applicants had considerable landed property in the district of Azamgarh and after the abolition of zamindari in the State of Uttar Pradesh it was reduced to sir and khudkasht plots only and they are in possession of the applicants. The Assistant Custodian, Azamgarh, opposite party No. 2, issued a notice on the 4th












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top