SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 218

J.K.TANDON, RAGHUBAR DAYAL, B.MUKERJI
KALAWATI DEVI – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRA PRAKASH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C.SAKSENA, Shabd Saran


R. DAYAL, J.

( 1 ) ONE Ganga Prasad instituted the suit in 1944 as a pauper. He prayed for permission to sue as pauper. The necessary permission was granted. Issues were framed on the 18th November, 1946. Ganga Prasad died on 39-11-10-10. Smt. Kalawati, his sister applied to be added as a party to the suit as Ganga Prasads legal representative. She just mentioned in the application that she was also a pauper hut she did not make any formal prayer in the application that she be either allowed to sue as pauper or to continue the suit as a pauper. On the 10th August, 1949 the court ordered that she he added as a party as legal representative of ganga Prasad. The court then proceeded into an inquiry whether she was a pauper and held on the 17th February, 1950 that she was not a pauper, and therefore she should pay the requisite court-fee.

( 2 ) KALAWATI then filed a revision in this Court contending that she should have been allowed, as legal representative, to continue the suit as provided under Order 33 Rule 8 of the Code of Civil procedure, that she could not be ordered to pay court-fee when there was no application by the defendant or the Government Pleader under Order 33 Rule 9 of



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top