SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 310

D.N.ROY, J.N.TAKRU
THAN MAL – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.Swarup, K.C.SAKSENA

D. N. ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision has been referred by a learned single Judge of this Court to the Division Bench on account of certain important questions of law arising in it.


( 2 ) A firm styled as Sukhdayal Ram Bilas held a decree against Basdeo Sheo Karan Das. In execution of that decree certain property belonging to the judgment-debtor was put up for sale and a sum of Rs. 28,000/- was realised and a sum of Rs. 7,078-10-0 was paid towards the decree in execution of which the property was sold and a sum of RS. 1510-5-0 was rateably distributed to certain other decree-holders. A balance of Rs. 19,411-1-0 remained in deposit with the court. That sum was attached in a number of Proceedings both before judgment and after passing of decrees. The judgment-debtor firm had been assessed to income-tax and a sum of Rs. 31,448-15-0 were due on account of the income-tax. The Income-Tax Officer of Fatehgarh by a letter dated the 14th of February, 1950 informed the Civil Judge that a recovery certificate had been issued to the Collector under Section 46 (2) of the Income-tax Act and he asked the Civil judge that payment should be stayed in regard to the amount to various creditors of M/s kan
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top