SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(All) 296

R.N.GURTU
ABHIMAN SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAM HIT SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
LALJI SINHA, Laxmi Saran, SHAMBHU PRASAD

R. N. GURTU, J.

( 1 ) THIS was a suit by the plaintiffs against two defendants for a declaration that they were the owners in possession of the property described at the foot of the plaint under a sale deed dated 2-11-1931.

( 2 ) ONE of the defendants namely, Ram Anjor Singh, was a minor at the time of the suit. The plaintiffs had, therefore, to get a guardian ad litem appointed. An application was made proposing the mother as the guardian ad litem. She refused. Then another relation was proposed. He also refused and finally the plaintiffs moved that the court should appoint an advocate as the guardian of the said, minor. Accordingly, Sri Raj Bahadur Lal Vakil was appointed guardian. After his appointment Sri Raj Bahadur Lal made an application for permission to refer the case to the arbitration of one Bhagauti Din Tewari. The court granted permission for the case to be referred. The other defendant Ram Hit Singh, was also a party to the reference. After the case had been referred to the arbitrator appointed and some adjournments had also been granted to the arbitrator, the minor made an application stating that he had received no notice and that his guardian ad litem had been appo










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top