SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 38

JAMES, RAGHUBAR DAYAL
DULAN DAYAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRASADI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.RATHORE, P.C.Chaturvedi

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 417, Sub-section (3) Criminal P. C. , as in force from 1-1-1956, in view of the Central Government Notification No. 1/11/ 55- Judl (R), dated 1-12-1955, published in India Gazette, dated 10-12-1955.

( 2 ) DULAN Dayal Singhs complaint was dismissed and the accused were acquitted of the various offences by a Magistrate I Class Faizabad, on 31-10-1955. He filed this application for leave to appeal on 25-1-1956. The application would be in time in case the applicant was given the benefit of Section 12, Limitation Act.

( 3 ) THE learned single Judge referred a point for decision to this Bench, and the point formulated by him is: "whether the right given by Section 417 (3), Cr. P. C. , would apply to cases filed in which the proceedings in the Magistrates Court are started before the Act came into force or would apply only to those cases which are initiated after the coming in of this Act. " another application under Section 417 (3), Criminal P. C. , instituted by Kedar Nath Bhargava has also been referred to this Bench by the learned single Judge. Kedar Nath Bhargava seeks leave to ap peal against an order of acquittal, dated












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top