SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 26

DESAI, UPADHYA
RAMA SHANKER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Pandey, Sriram

DESAI, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application for quashing the proceedings pending against the applicant in the court of a first class Magistrate or transferring the proceedings to another district. The proceedings are under Section 406, I. P. C. , commenced on a report of the police. The case against him is that he embezzled a large sum of money which was entrusted to him for being carried from one place to another. A Panchayat Raj inspector made a report against the applicant on 8-7-1954 on the following allegations :

( 2 ) THE Inspector encashed a cheque for the sum of Rs. 5,746/14/- at Ghazipur in the presence of the applicant who is a businessman. The Inspector was afraid of carrying such a large sum of money from Ghazipur to Dildarnagar where his headquarters are. The applicant offered to carry the money, which was kept in a purse, from Ghazipur to Tarighat across the Ganges. The applicant and the Inspector separated. When some time later the Inspector met the applicant at tarighat and asked for the money, the applicant told him that he had already returned it to him. Actually the money had not been returned.

( 3 ) THE police investigated into the matter, raided the applicants shop a











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top