SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 23

ASTHANA
GUR CHARAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohammad Baqar Usmani

ASTHANA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision by four persons, namely, Gurcharan, Bhagwan, Jagarnath and Balram, who have been convicted under Section 379, I. P. C. , by a first class Magistrate of ghazipur. Gurcharan and Balram were sentenced to 9 months rigorous imprisonment and bhagwan and Jagarnath to 6 months rigorous imprisonment. Their conviction and sentences have been upheld in appeal by the learned Sessions Judge.

( 2 ) IT appears that on the 13th October, 1953 a complaint was filed by Smt. Biranjia, widow of mahadeo Koeri, against the applicants that they had cut her crop in plot No. 909 on the 23rd august 1953 at about 2 p. m. and had thereby committed theft. The applicants denied that they had cut the crop. It may be mentioned here that prior to this complaint Smt. Biranjia had filed a report under Section 145/506, I. P. C. , against the applicants at the police station. Subsequent to this report Smt. Biranjia filed a complaint before the District Magistrate, Ghazipur, in respect of the same occurrence. The District Magistrate called for a report from the police and after a perusal of the report was not satisfied that the prosecution case was correct. He, theref








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top