SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 88

MEHROTRA, SAHAI, OAK
DALGANJAN KOERI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.Dwivedi


MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THE following order of law has been referred to us by the learned Single Judge: -"whether Section 188, I. P. C. is applicable to orders passed in judicial proceedings by civil, revenue or criminal courts?" the facts giving rise to this revision are that Srimati Manbasia, Parana Koori, Shakal Koori, Dal ganjan Koeri and Prikhka Koeri are alleged to have cut and removed the crop of plot No. 485/1, 25 decimals. A suit under Section 60, U. P. Tenancy Act was filed by Ram Krishun Lal and others against Srimati Manbasia and others which was pending in the Court of the Judicial officer in respect of plot No. 485/1, area 25 decimals. In that suit an order was passed for the attachment of the crop on the 16th January, 1951 and the crop was ordered to be attached through a commissioner Sri Tribhuwan Tewari. An order of injunction was served by the commissioner on the parties not to damage the crop in question. Three persons were appointed caretakers of the crop and they made a complaint on the 5th march, 1951 that the present applicants, in disobedience of the order of injunction, cut away the crop. On these facts the applicants were prosecuted under Sections 379 and 188,













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top