SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 62

AGARWALA, M.L.CHATURVEDI
VINDHYACHAL TEWARI – Appellant
Versus
BOARD OF REVENUE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.L.DIXIT, H.C.Sharma, L.RATHORE, O.N.MEHROTRA, P.Chaturvedi

AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THESE are three connected applications under Article 226 of the Constitution. The prayer in each case is that the order of the Board of Revenue dated 30-8-1955 and the order of the additional Commissioner dated 4-7-1953 be quashed. The facts briefly stated are as follows :

( 2 ) TWO persons Mahudeo Prasad and Jagat Nandn were zemindars of about four annas share in a village and had certain sir and khudkasht lands. In 1921 they executed a usufructuary mortgage in favour of one Ham Lal for a sum of Rs. 4999/ -. On 1-8-1931 they executed a second usufructuary mortgage in favour of four persons, Subedar Singh, Rajdeo Singh, Jamuna Singh and Alakhdeo Singh for a sum of Rs. 7000/-, Heaving sufficient amount in the hands of the mortgagees to redeem the earlier usufructuary mortgage and to enter into possession of the mortgage property. The second mortgagee redeemed the earlier mortgage and entered into possession. The rights of the mortgagors Mahadeo Prasad, and Jagat Narain came to vest in the present petitioner vindhyachal Tewari and his brother Bhiku Ram Tewari. In the year 1944 the petitioner and his brother filed an application under Section 12, Agriculturists Relie


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top