SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 50

KIDWAI, RANDHIR SINGH
TAJAMMUL HUSAIN – Appellant
Versus
QAISAR JAHAN BEGAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mohd.Ayub, NAZIRUDDIN, SURESH CHANDRA

RANDHIR SINGH, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 133, Constitution of India for leave to appeal to the supreme Court against the judgment and decree qf this Court, dated 5-5-1954.

( 2 ) THE application has been opposed on the ground that the value of the subject matter in appeal in this Court as also in the proposed appeal was less than Rs. 20,000/ -. The suit which has given rise to the appeal in this Court was a suit for accounting and was decided by the trial court on the 1st March, 1946. The court granted a decree for Rs. 13,888/5/9. The plaintiff then came up in appeal to this Court and the appeal was valued at Rs. 19,431/0/5. This appeal was partly allowed and the sum decreed by the lower court was enhanced by a sum of Rs. 109/9/9. There was also a cross-objection and this was valued at Rs. 6,000/ -. The cross-objection was also partly allowed to the extent of Rs. 655/ -. The plaintiff now wishes to go in appeal to the Supreme Court as the decree passed by the trial Court was varied in appeal. An appeal could be instituted in the Supreme Court only if the value of the subject matter in appeal was Rs. 20,000/- or above. The value of the subject matter in appeal in






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top