IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Mehrotra, J.
SANGAM LAL DUBE - Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION - Respondents
Writ Petn. 220 Of 1956
Decided On : 08/16/1956
ARTICLE 311 - CIVIL SERVANT - REDUCTION IN RANK - TRANSFER - BOARD OF HIGH SCHOOL AND INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION - DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION - POWERS - EDUCATIONAL CODE - SECRETARY OF THE BOARD - POWERS.
Fact of the Case:
Petitioner, a clerk in the office of the Board of High School and Intermediate Education, was transferred to the office of the Government Normal School, Aligarh, and subsequently to the Government Intermediate College, Allahabad, and then to the office of the District Inspector of Schools, Patehpur, and finally to the office of the District Inspector of Schools, Farrukhabad. The petitioner contended that the transfers amounted to reduction in rank and that he was entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the transfer of the petitioner from the office of the Board of High School and Intermediate Education to the office of the Government Normal School, Aligarh, amounted to reduction in rank and that the petitioner was entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution. The court further held that the Director of Education had no power to transfer the petitioner and that the transfer was in fact punishment awarded to the petitioner.
Issues: 1. Whether the transfer of the petitioner amounted to reduction in rank? 2. Whether the petitioner was entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution? 3. Whether the Director of Education had power to transfer the petitioner?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the transfer of the petitioner from the office of the Board of High School and Intermediate Education to the office of the Government Normal School, Aligarh, amounted to reduction in rank because it was based on the complaint made by the Secretary of the Board and was not purely on administrative grounds. 2. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to protection under Article 311 of the Constitution because he was a civil servant and the transfer amounted to reduction in rank. 3. The court held that the Director of Education had no power to transfer the petitioner because the Board of High School and Intermediate Education was not a part of the Education Department and the staff of the Board was not a part of the Education Department.
Final Decision: The court allowed the petition and quashed the orders of transfer. The court also directed that if the Board desired to take any steps against the petitioner, the provisions of Article 311 should be complied with and he should be given an opportunity to explain his conduct.
( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of certiorari be issued quashing the orders passed by the Director of Education transferring the petitioner from the post of a clerk in the office of the Board of High School Intermediate Education to the office of the Government Normal School, Aligarh,
( 2 ) THE petitioner was appointed as a temporary clerk in the office of the Board of High School and Intermediate Education U. P. , Allahabad by the order of the Secretary of the aforesaid Board dated 24-9-1942 and by another order of the Secretary dated 27-8-1945 he was appointed a clerk in the scale of Rs. 30--2 1/2--50. By an order of the Secretary of the Board dated 30-9-1948 the petitioner was confirmed in his permanent appointment as a Lower Division Assistant in the said office. His scale was subsequently increased to Rs. 60--4--100 on the recommendation of the U. P. Pay Committees Report. On 21-4-1947 he was promoted to a temporary Tenancy in the higher scale of Rs. 80-6-110--EB--6--140 and he continued to work in this increased scale with brief interruptions. After 1-2-1949 he, however, continued to work in the higher scale and was never reverted. He received three increments in pay on 19-8-1948, 1-1-1950 and 23-1-1951 respectively. On 15-2-1952 the Secretary of the Board passed an order appointing the petitioner to a temporary post in the higher scale of Rs. 80--6--110--EB--6--140--EB--10--200--EB--20--240 with effect from 1-1-1952. From 1-1-1952 till 14-6-1953 the petitioner worked as a clerk in the aforesaid scale and on 30-5-1953 an order was passed transferring the petitioner from the office of the Board to the office of the Government Normal School, Aligarh, and in consequence of the said order he was relieved with effect from 15-6-1953. The petitioner took leave and rejoined on 13-10-1953. Another order was then passed on 6-10-1953 by the Director of Education Uttar Pradesh directing that, with effect from the date of his rejoining he would be appointed to the post of Head Clerk, Government Intermediate college, Allahabad in the scale of Rs. 80--5--100--6--130. This was only a temporary appointment and it is contended by the petitioner that this order had the effect of reducing the petitioners rank from the post of a clerk in a higher scale to a lower one. The petitioner alleges that the impugned orders amount to reduction in rank and as he was a civil servant under Article 311 of the Constitution he was entitled to an opportunity being given to him to show cause against such orders.
( 3 ) IN the affidavit filed in support of the petition it has been stated that the petitioners work was throughout appreciated and he was never found guilty of any misconduct which would disentitle him to remain in service.
( 4 ) IN May and June, 1953, however, he was entrusted with confidential work in connection with the examination results of 1953. A supplementary affidavit was filed by the petitioner in which he has stated that the petitioner apprehends that the order of transfer has been passed at the instance of Sri N. D. Gothi, the then secretary of the Board. The Secretary was displeased on account of certain instances which the petitioner had set out in his affidavit.
( 5 ) IN or about August 1949 the Secretary was the Registrar Departmental Examinations and the petitioner was working as Librarian in charge of the Library Section of the Board. In the month of August the Secretary came to the Library and told the petitioner that he wanted to go through the books which had been submitted by different publishers for being approved as text-bocks for the Intermediate Examination of the Board. The Secretary said that he was also writing a book which would be submitted for approval and selection by the Board as a test-book for the aforesaid examination and he, therefore, wanted to go through the books submitted by other authors on the same subject. As the books which were submitted for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.