SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 134

V.D.BHARGAVA
SHAHZAD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
PT. SHEO KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.D.MISHRA

V. D. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision against an order under Section 152, Civil P. C, refusing to amend the decree in the suit.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that on 26-7-1901 a mortgage deed was executed by Bhairon Khan, the predecessor-in-interest of the applicant, in favour of four persons who are now represented by the opposite parties. The plots mortgaged were 25 plots and the area of the plots given in the mortgage-deed was 40 bighas, 8 biswas and 14 biswansis and was situate in village Dhuremau, district Rae Bareli.

( 3 ) IN the plaint the property was -described as 29 plots measuring 19 bighas, The suit was decreed and the entire decretal amount has been deposited and the property redeemed. It is alleged that the plaintiff is in possession of the entire mortgaged property, i. e. 40 bighas, 8 biswas and 14 biswansis. Some mistake cropped up in the decree on account of wrong description in the plaint. The application was opposed by the opposite party in the Court below and the learned Judge dismissed the application for amendment. Though it was admitted that there was no such mortgaged property, in the entire village where the disputed property given i









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top