SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 133

MEHROTRA
SRIMAHANT VISHESHWAR SHIVACHARAYA MAHASWAMI MAHANT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.KIRTY, AMBIKA PRASAD, GANESH PRASAD, GYAN PRAKASH, H.N.Kapur, J.Swarup

MEHROTRA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of certiorari be issued quashing the notifications under Sections. 4, 6 and 9, Land Acquisition Act and that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the opposite parties not to proceed with the acquisition proceedings relating to the property in question.

( 2 ) THE facts briefly are that the applicant is a Mahant of a well-known Math in the city of varanasi called Sri Jagat Guru Vishwaradhya Singhasan or Jangamwudi Math being in existence for several hundred years. The Math owns several properties including the disputed plot which is situated just in front of the main building of the Math across the road. The land is enclosed mostly by houses and on one side by a pucca wall. Within this enclosure on a portion of the land there are temples and samadhis of disciples, who, according to the tenets of the Shaiva sect, come and die in Varanasi and are buried there in the enclosure. The contention of the petitioner is that this land is not a waste or arable land and consequently the State government has no power to take action under Section 17 (4), Land Acquisition Act and to dispense with the p





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top