SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 124

JAMES
LALIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
S. S. BOSE – Respondent


JAMES, J.


( 1 ) THIS application by Mr. Lalit Kumar, a pleader of Bareilly, is under Section 561-A Cr. P. C. and seeks the expunction of certain derogatory remarks against him contained in the judgment dated the 13th March 1956 by Mr. S. S. Bose, Assistant Sessions Judge, in sessions trial No. 80 of 1955, State v. Dhani and Mool Chand, under Section 392 I. P. C. The application has been, sponsored by the Bar Association of Bareilly.

( 2 ) THE applicant is a panel pleader, i. e. , in the absence of regular State Counsel he appears for the state in certain criminal cases and receives a daily fee, which I understand is Rs. 24/- for a full days work arid Rs. 12/- for work upto 1 p. m. He was appearing on behalf of the State in the aforementioned sessions trial before Mr. Bose.

( 3 ) THE circumstances in which this appli-cation has arisen are not disputed, and indeed will be found in Mr. Boses own judgment. .

( 4 ) THE case was heard on the 27th and 28th February 1956 and, was adjourned for the following day. A police official named Mahen-dra Pal Singh had been summoned for the 28th but had failed to appear, apparently because he was then serving in another dislrict and his summons had












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top