SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 103

MEHROTRA, SAHAI
SHAUKAT ALI KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.H.BEG

MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition on behalf of four applicants praying that under the provisions of Chap. 23, rule 29 of the Rules of Court the applicants be ordered to execute bonds undertaking to lodge a petition before the Supreme Court and the execution of the sentence against them may be stayed.

( 2 ) THE facts which have given rise to this petition briefly are that the applicants were convicted by a Magistrate under Sections 325/34 and 323, I. P. C. Their convictions were maintained on appeal and the appellate court gave a sentence of imprisonment till the rising of the Court and rs. 50/- as fine each.


( 3 ) A revision was filed to this Court against the decision of the Additional Sessions Judge in appeal. At the time of the admission of the revision, notice was issued by a learned Single Judge of this Court to show cause why the sentences passed upon the applicants should, not be enhanced. Both the revision application on behalf of the applicants and that relating to enhancement matter came up before us and we, by our order dated 15-3-56, rejected the application of the applicants and enhanced the sentences passed by the court below from one of till the rising of the cou























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top