SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 96

MEHROTRA
GREAT EASTERN ELECTROPLATERS, LTD. – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMR. , UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.Swarup, MAN SINGH

MEHROTRA, J.

( 1 ) THIS ia an application under Article 226 of the Constitution praying that a writ of mandamus be issued directing the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, U. P. , Kanpur, not to take action under the provisions of the Employees Provident Funds Act of 1952 and the Employees provident Funds Amendment Act of 1953 against the applicant.

( 2 ) THE petitioner was registered as a public limited company in the year 1948 to work on an electro plating pattern, colour and chrome plating plant in India. The electroplating plant was imported and installed in Allahabad and the factory was started in October, 1950 on a trial basis. The real production, according to the petitioner, started from January, 1951. In the affidavit filed in support of the petition it is alleged that since the date of its establishment, the factory has been experimenting with one kind of thing or the other to find out as to what they could produce profitably and the work continued on an experimental basis. After some time of the starting of the factory, they took to the production of metal cases of torches along with the electroplating work and consequently the numer of workers had been increased. In 1














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top