SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 181

V.D.BHARGAVA
PITAMBAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER – Respondent


V. D. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution filed by one Pitamber Das who held license of two guns for several years. The license was in the name of his father and in 1937 was changed into his name when his father died. The petitioners servant Ram Adhar on the 11th of January 1955 took one of the guns to the house of the cousin of the petitioner, Seth puranmal, because there was Tilak ceremony. While the petitioner was busy this servant loaded the gun and fired it on the occasion of the tilak ceremony. The gun injured one Ram Khelawan a servant of Kashi and later on the servant was prosecuted under Section 304a of the Indian Penal code and was convicted. Thereafter the petitioner was also prosecuted under Section 22 of the Indian Arms Act but in the circumstances of the case the Magistrate took a lenient view of the case and released him under section 3 of the First Offenders Act on admonition. Thereafter the petitioner applied for the return of the license but the Deputy Commissioner without giving any opportunity to show cause on the 13th of July 1955 cancelled the petitioners license on the ground that the licensee had been conv







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top