SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 180

CHOWDHRY, MUKERJI
DHOOM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C.Chaturvedi, SHRI RAMA

CHOWDHRY, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an appeal by one Dhoom Singh, aged 20 years, who has been convicted by the learned additional sessions Judge of Muzaffarnagar under Section 302, I. P. C. , for the murder of a 10 years old boy Ranbir singh and sentenced to death. The leference under Section 374, Criminal procedure Code, for confirmation of the sentence is also before us.

( 2 ) TWO brothers Baljit P. W. 1 and Chatra lived in separate houses in village Pachenda. The appellant is a son of Chatru. The deceased Ranbir and a 5 years old girl Ranbiri were Baljits children by a concubine Gangadevi by name. She had deserted him 2 or 3 years previously. Baljit owned 7 bighas of cultivatory land, two houses and 3 heads of cattle.

( 3 ) THE prosecution case is that Baljit fell seriously ill about a fortnight before the occurrence so that his children had to find for their food from house to house. So after about a week of illness he called the appellant and entrusted to him the care of his children and property in case he died, and the appellant began to look after them.

( 4 ) THE deceased and the appellant used to go together for bringing fodder. They did so on sunday, September 18, 1955, also but t


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top