SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 163

AGARWALA, BEG
DILDAR HUSAIN – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL MOID – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMBIKA PRASAD, B.S.DARBAR, SADDIQ ALI

AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal against an order of the Court below rejecting the appellants application for setting aside an ex parte order dismissing his suit in the absence of the plaintiff.

( 2 ) THE facts shortly stated are as follows:

( 3 ) THE plaintiff Dildar Husain filed a suit against the defendant-respondent Abdul Moid for possession over a certain property and for accounts. A rival suit was also filed by the defendant abdul Moid for an injunction restraining the plaintiff-appellant Dildar Husain from interfering with Abdul Molds possession over the property in dispute. The two suits were consolidated and were being heard together. There was an order of injunction passed against the plaintiff Dildar husain in Abdul Moids suit. The date fixed for final hearing in the two cases was the 1st february, 1951. Two days earlier, namely, on the 30th January, 1951, in Abdul Moids suit the order of injunction had been discharged. On that date, Dildar Husain, the present plaintiff-appelant had not appeared and his counsel had stated that he had no instructions. This was in Abdul Moids suit.

( 4 ) ON the 1st February, 1951, the suit which has given rise to the present a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top