SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 222

H.S.CHATURVEDI, RANDHIR SINGH
UNION OF INDIA, NORTHERN RAILWAY – Appellant
Versus
S. BAGCHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.M.Mulla, D.P.Khare

RANDHIR SINGH, J.


( 1 ) BOTH these appeals have been heard together as they arise out of two similar suits in which tile parties were common and which were disposed of by a single judgment.

( 2 ) THE two suits were instituted by Sri S. Bagchi, plaintiff-respondent, for the recovery of damages in respect of two consignments of oranges booked from railway station Kalambha to lucknow, Both of these consignments were full wagon-loads of oranges. One of them was consigned on the 21st of March, 1946, and the goods were loaded in wagon No. 18182. The second consignment was also booked from the same railway station Kalambha for Lucknow on the 21st of April, 1946. The first consignment was delivered at Lucknow on the 30th March, 1946 and the second consignment was delivered at Lucknow on the 3rd May, 1946. It was alleged on behalf of the plaintiff in the two suits. that the goods which were oranges were booked to be carried by passenger train but the railway did not carry out the contract of carrying the goods by passenger train and were also negligent on account of which the oranges deteriorated and the plaintiff was put to considerable loss in the two consignments. He claimed rs. 5,000/-












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top