DESAI, BEG
ABDUL GHANI – Appellant
Versus
VISHUNATH – Respondent
( 1 ) THE opposite party filed a suit against the applicant for possession of a piece of land after demolition of a construction made thereon by the applicant. For purposes of jurisdiction and also of court-fee he valued the land only according to its market price; he did not include the value of the construction standing upon it. An objection was raised by the applicant against the valuation and the court-fee paid on the plaint. The Munsif held that the correct value of the land was Rs. 1694/- and ordered the opposite party to increase the valuation to Rs. 1694/- and pay additional court-fee thereon. He assessed the value of the construction at Rs. 4623/- but was of the opinion that it was not to be taken into consideration in deciding the valuation of the suit for purposes of jurisdiction and court-fee. Against his decision the applicant has come up in revision.
( 2 ) THERE is a preliminary objection on the ground that the revision is not maintainable because the learned Munsifs deciding that the valuation of the land is Rs. 1694/- and that court-fee should be paid on that amount does not amount to his deciding a case within the meaning of section 115, C. P C. The oppos
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.