SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(All) 192

MUKERJI, CHOWDHRY
PREM NARAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.SARAN, Makund Lal Agarwala

MUKERJI, J.

( 1 ) THESE are two connected appeals, one by Prem alias Prem Narain, and the other by Nanhey, who were both tried by the learned Sessions Judge of Shahjahanpur at one trial held in May, 1956. Prem was convicted under Section 302 of the I. P. C. for having murdered one Lallan by shooting him with a pistol at about 10-30 p. m. on the 31st of October, 1955, in Mohalla chaukasi in the city of Shahjahanpur, and sentenced to death for that offence. Nanhey was charged under Section 302 read with Section 34 I. P. C. , for having partaken in the common intention of Prem to murder Lallan. The learned Sessions Judge held Nanhey guilty alternatively under Section 302/114 I. P. C. , and sentenced him to imprisonment for life. Prem gave out his age as 15 or 16 years, but the learned Sessions Judge thought he was 20 years of age. We ourselves had him before us and we were of the opinion that Prem was nearer 17 than 20 years of age. Nanhey gave his age as 17 years but the learned Sessions Judge thought he was about 20 years of age. We have not had the advantage of seeing him, for he was not before the Court when these appeals were heard by us. Both the appellants were in any case very















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top