SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 127

AGARWALA, RANDHIR SINGH
JAGANNATH PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
MST. RAM DULAREY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K.DHAON, M.L.Trivedi, Mohd.Ayub, MOHD.HUSAIN

AGARWALA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for the recovery of a sum of Rs. 10,000/- from the defendants respondents. The facts, briefly stated, are as follows:

( 2 ) ONE Baijnath, brother of Sheo Prasad, Plaintiff appellant 2, and father of plaintiff appellant 1 and one Janki Prasad, husband of Smt. Ram Dulari defendant respondent 3, were close relations. Baijnath, according to the plaintiffs appellants, was a member of a joint Hindu family along with the other plaintiffs and used to deposit at different times, various sums of money with Janki prasad. Janki Prasad used to carry on money-lending business on an extensive scale. He used to advance money to various debtors and on one occasion on 30-7-1920 he obtained a mortgage deed from two persons, Mohammad Askari and Agha Ali for a sum of Rs. 9000/ -. The amount was not paid by the mortgagors and both Janki Prasad and Baijnath filed a suit on the basis of the mortgage and obtained a decree and the mortgaged property was sold and a sum of rs. 14,850/- was deposited in court on 4-6-1921. There was a dispute between Baijnath and Janki Prasad about the ownership of the mortgage money, and Baijnath filed a suit

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top