IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Mehrotra and Sahai, JJ.
STATE - Appellant
Versus
GHISSU KHAN - Respondents
Govt. Appeal 1442 Of 1952
Decided On : 12/20/1955
CRIMINAL LAW - ARMS ACT - SECTION 19/20 (F) - CONVICTION - VALIDITY - INTENTION TO CONCEAL WEAPONS - INFERENCE FROM MANNER OF KEEPING AND CONCEALING - SECTION 399, I. P. C. - PREPARATION FOR COMMITTING DACOITY - MERE ARREST OF PERSONS TOGETHER WITH UNLICENSED WEAPONS - INSUFFICIENT TO INFER PREPARATION - SECTION 402, I. P. C. - ASSEMBLAGE FOR COMMITTING DACOITY - MERE ARREST OF PERSONS TOGETHER - INSUFFICIENT TO INFER ASSEMBLAGE.
Fact of the Case:
Accused were arrested in a train compartment with unlicensed weapons. The prosecution alleged that they were preparing to commit dacoity. The Sessions Judge acquitted them under Sections 399 and 402, I. P. C., but convicted three of them under Section 19/20 (f) of the Arms Act.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court upheld the acquittal under Sections 399 and 402, I. P. C., holding that the mere arrest of persons together with unlicensed weapons does not necessarily lead to the inference that they had collected for the purpose of committing dacoity or that they had made preparations to commit dacoity. However, the Court upheld the conviction under Section 19/20 (f) of the Arms Act, holding that the manner in which the weapons were kept and concealed indicated an intention to conceal them.
Issues: 1. Whether the mere arrest of persons together with unlicensed weapons is sufficient to infer preparation for committing dacoity under Section 399, I. P. C.? 2. Whether the mere arrest of persons together is sufficient to infer assemblage for committing dacoity under Section 402, I. P. C.? 3. Whether the manner of keeping and concealing weapons can indicate an intention to conceal them under Section 19/20 (f) of the Arms Act?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The Court held that the mere arrest of persons together with unlicensed weapons does not necessarily lead to the inference that they had collected for the purpose of committing dacoity or that they had made preparations to commit dacoity. The Court relied on the fact that the accused were arrested in a railway compartment and were not found in possession of any material required for committing house breaking. 2. The Court held that the mere arrest of persons together does not necessarily lead to the inference that they had assembled for the purpose of committing dacoity. The Court relied on the fact that there was no evidence to show that the accused had done any other overt act which amounted to preparation. 3. The Court held that the manner in which the weapons were kept and concealed indicated an intention to conceal them. The Court relied on the fact that the weapons were concealed in the folds of the accused's dhotis and that the tamancha contained live cartridges.
Final Decision: The Court rejected the Government's appeal against the acquittal under Sections 399 and 402, I. P. C., and rejected the accused's appeal against their conviction under Section 19/20 (f) of the Arms Act.
MEHROTRA J.
( 1 ) GHISSU, Mohar Singh, Janak Singh, Ranicharan, Pemraj and Baburam were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Budaun under Section 399, I. P. C. In the alternative they all but Mohar Singh were further charged under Section 402, I. P. C. Baburam, Ghissu Khan and janak were further charged under Section 19/20 (f), Arms Act and accused Mohar Singh was further charged under Section 19 (f), Arms Act. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all the accused under Section 399 or 402, I. P. C. He, however, convicted Janak Singh, Ghissu Khan and Baburam under Section 19/20 (f) of the Arms Act and sentenced them to three years R. I 2 1/2 years R. I. and 2 years R. I. respectively. The three accused who have been convicted under Section 19/20 (f), Arms Act have filed an appeal to this Court against their convictions which is numbered Criminal Appeal no. 754 of 1952. The State has filed an appeal against Ghissu Khan, Janak Singh, Ramcharan, pemraj and Baburam against their acquittal.
( 2 ) THE prosecution case is that on 16-10-1951, one Phullan Shah who is a prosecuting witness was going from his village Jagat to his father-in-laws place in village Chandernagar Kharer. In the way at about 11 a. m. he met the accused Baburam, Ghissu and Mohar Singh (who has been acquitted by the Sessions Judge and there is no appeal against him) in a grove in village budhwai. Phullan Shah inquired from them as to where they were going. The accused Baburam thereupon told him that next day they were going to commit a dacoity at the house of one Piarelal in village Shanti Nagla close to railway station Kachla Ghat: thereupon, Baburam asked the witness Phullan Shah if he would also accompany them. Phullan shah then inquired from him about the time of their departure and was told that all would leave by 2-30 p. m. train from Budaun for Kachla Ghat. Phullan Shah then left them and promised that he would join them at Budaun railway station. Next day he returned from his father-in-laws place and informed the Circle Inspector, mohammad Ismail Khan, at Budaun about the talk which he had with Baburam. The Circle inspector produced Phullan Shah before Sri Singhal, the Deputy Superintendent of Police. They then came to Sher Ali Khan who was then in charge Superintendent of Police. Phullan Shah narrated the whole talk, which he had with Baburam, to the Superintendent of Police. He was then directed to proceed by train with the gang and was told that the police party would meet him at Kachla Ghat Railway Station. When the train would reach the station he would be waiving his hand from outside the window pointing out the compartment in which the dacoits would be travelling. Phullan Shah complied with the instructions and joined them at the appointed station as arranged before. The police party consisting of the in charge Superintendent of Police, the Deputy Superintendent of Police, the Circle Inspector and some ten or 15 constables left in a truck and a pick up. On reaching Kachla, the Circle Inspector called Raghunandan Prasad, Nawab Singh and narottam Singh witnesses and then all proceeded to the railway station. The Station Master was informed and was asked to detain the train. When the train reached Kachla Ghat at 3-30 p. m. , Phullan Shah, as arranged, waived his hand and the compartment was then surrounded by the police and, on being pointed out by Phullan Shah, all the five opposite parties in the Government Appeal were arrested. They were taken down to the platform and in the presence of Nawab Singh, Raghunandan Prasad, Narottam Singh, Station master, the Deputy Superintendent of Police and in charge Superintendent of Police their persons were searched. Inside the folds of Janak Singhs dhoti a tamancha containing live cartridges was recovered. In the pocket of Baburam were found three live cartridges tied in a piece of cloth and in the folds of ghissu Khans dhoti was thrust and, concealed one spearhead. Nothing incriminating wa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.