SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(All) 232

B.M.LAL, OAK
KASHI PRASAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GUPTESHWAR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.N.Singh, VISHWANATH SINGH

BRIJ MOHAN LALL, J.


( 1 ) THIS Civil Revision is connected with First Appeal from Order No. 328 of 1952.

( 2 ) IT appears that the applicant, Thakural Kashi Prasad Singh and two of the opposite parties, viz. , Thakurai Gupteshwar Singh and Thakurai Jagdish Prasadi Singh, executed an arbitration agreement on 29-4-1950. They appointed two persons, viz. , Sri Raj Kishore Singh and Sri Mutun behari Singh, as arbitrators and a third person, Sri Jai Shankar Lal Vakil, as Sarpanch. As no suit was pending, the arbitration was intended to take place without the intervention of the court. It so happened that Sri Raj Kishore Singh and Sri Mutun Behari Singh refused to act as arbitrators. Thereupon Thakurai Gupteshwar Singh served notices on the other two executants of the arbitration agreement calling upon them to nominate fresh arbitrators. No step was taken by the remaining two executants on receipt of these notices, whereupon Thakurai Gupteshwar Singh made an application to court under Section 8 (2), Indian Arbitration Act (X of 1940) for the appointment of arbitrators in place of the two arbitrators mentioned in the arbitration agreement who had refused to act. This application was regist














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top