SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 6

B.M.LAL
AMAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
DADU DAYALU MAHASABHA AND ORS. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Pandey, A.SANYAL, B.UPADHYAY, DEVI NARAIN, G.P.BHARGAVA, N.D.OJHA

BRIJ MOHAN LALL, J.


( 1 ) SWAMI Amar Das has made an application under Section 276, Succession Act (39 of 1925) for probate in respect of the will of late Mahant Mohan Das Swami.

( 2 ) ONE of the items bequeathed by means of this will in favour of the applicant is a life assurance policy of the deceased for a sum of Rs. 2,000/ -. The deceased had under Section 39 (1), insurance Act (4 of 1938), named the petitioner as the nominee in respect of the said insurance policy. The petitioner contends that by reason of the aforesaid nomination he can, under Section 39 (6), Insurance Act, claim the amount due under the policy from the Insurance Company, and can ignore the bequest contained in the will. He maintains that he need not pay court-fees in respect of this item.

( 3 ) THE Junior Secretary, Board of Revenue, has raised an objection to the effect that court-fee must be paid in respect of this sum of Rs. 2,000/- also. Section 19-I (i), Court-fees Act lays down: "that no order entitling the petitioner to the grant of probate. . . . . . . . . . . . shall be made upon an application for such grant until the petitioner has filed in the Court a valuation of the property in the Form set for










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top