SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 63

RAGHUBAR DAYAL, MUKERJI
BHAGWAN DAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE THROUGH BADRI PRASAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.Pandey, GOPAL BEHARI, S.P.KUMAR

MUKERJI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two applications have been made by certain persons who are standing their trial under section 420, I. P. C. before a Magistrate at Bareilly. The applicants are residents of Orissa and they have a business office at Calcutta. They are the producers of certain vegetable products in the nature of vegetable ghee, etc. and the complainant entered into an agreement with them on which, according to his case, he was appointed a sole distributor of the products of the Company which is sponsored by the accused applicants, for the Uttar Pradesh and Delhi Province. According to the complainant he parted with a total sum of Rs. 25,000/- by way of security to the company sponsored by the accused and that the accused used deception in getting this money from the complainant. The complainant wanted his money back but the accused have not so far refunded the money which they took under the pretext of its being a kind of security deposit.

( 2 ) ON 14-8-1951, the accused moved an application, through counsel, in the Court of the magistrate for being exempted from personal appearance on the dates of hearing of the complaint. On 27-8-1951, they moved another application before t










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top