BEG, MUKERJI
DULARI – Appellant
Versus
ADDL. CUSTODIAN, EVACUEE PROPERTY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application tinder Article 226 of the Constitution by Shrimati Dulari praying that this Court may issue a writ of prohibition or in the alternative appropriate directions, or orders under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prohibiting opposite party 1, i. e. , the Additional custodian Evacuee Property, Lucknow from reviewing his judgment dated 30-1-1951, passed in Appeal No. 276 of 1950. There is a further prayer that opposite party 2, namely, the Custodian evacuee Property at Lucknow be prohibited from issuing any notification under Section 7 of Act 31 of 1050 in respect of a certain house, details of which are given in the petibion, and treating it as "evacuee Property".
( 2 ) THE facts, briefly stated, which gave rise to this petition, were that op1 n 16-10-1947, the appli-qant purchased the property in dispute, which is situate at Ghaziabad, from one Shubratan, who made a sale of the property to the applicant for a sum of Rs. 2,500/- on her behalf and on behalf of her minor children and on behalf of another Naboo wife of one Allah Diya. The vendors left India for Pakistan as "evacuees" on 16-10-1949, and consequently the property in dispute as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.