SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 110

B.M.LAL
U. P. UNION BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
DINA NATH RAJA RAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MUKHTAR AHMED

BRIJ MOHAN LALL, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a suit by the Official Liquidators of the U. P. Union Bank Limited to recover a sum of rs. 2,677-5-8 from Messrs. Dinanath Raja Ram, a firm of cloth merchants, at Budaun. The bank being in liquidation, the suit has been instituted, by virtue of the provisions of Section 45-3 of the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act (20 of 1950), in this Court.

( 2 ) THE defendant firm had a current account with the bank when it was a going concern. The defendant had overdrawn that account. The suit has been instituted to recover the amount of the overdrafts together with interest due to the bank from the defendant firm.

( 3 ) TWO pleas have been put forward in defence. In the first place, it is contended that no interest is chargeable on the overdrafts. Secondly, it is contended that the bank had wrongly refused payment of a cheque for Rs. 1,500/- to the defendant firm and the amount of that cheque should be set off against the banks claim.

( 4 ) THE first plea can be easily disposed of. It is stated in Paragraph 1 of the plaint that the defendant had agreed "to repay on demand the amount advanced to him together with interest at the rate of 71/2 per cent, per annu
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top