SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(All) 104

V.BHARGAVA
NAKCHHED SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BIJAI BAHADUR SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.Trivedi, R.B.Chaudhary, Ram

BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is a plaintiffs appeal arising out of a suit for possession of certain property mentioned in the plaint. The facts that are either admitted or which have been found by the lower Court and are no longer questioned in this appeal are that the property in suit belonged to one Ram Harakh singh. In the year 1916 Ram Harakh Singh was murdered by Ram Anand Singh and Ram Narain singh, against whom the suit was brought by the appellants impleading them as defendants. Ram anand Singh and Ram Narain Singh both died during the pendency of this appeal in this Court. In their place Bijai Bahadur Singh and Ram Pal Singh sons of Ram Anand Singh have been substituted as legal representatives. They were impleaded as legal representatives of Ram Anand singh and Ram Narain Singh. These two respondents, Bijai Bahadur Singh and Ram Pal Singh were also impleaded as claiming in their own right. When Ram Harakh Singh died in the year 1916, he left Ms widow, Abhairaji but no issues. Abhairaji, therefore, succeeded to this property as widows estate and held it until 1933 when she died. On her death one claimant to the property in suit was Menda a daughter of Ram Harakh Singh and Abhai






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top