SAPRU, WALI ULLAH
AMRITSAR SUGAR MILL CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER, SALES TAX – Respondent
WALI ULLAH, J.
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Section 11 (2) (b), U. P. Sales Tax Act (Act XV [15] of 1948 ). This application was filed on 1-2-1932. Under Section 11 (2) of the Act it was necessary to file this application within 30 days of the refusal by the revising authority, i. e. , Judge (Revision) to refer to the High Court any question of law. There is a report by the Stamp Reporter of the Court that the application is beyond limitation by 16 days. On the other hand, it is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that if the time required for obtaining a copy of the order refusing to state a case be taken into account, the application made must be held to be within time.
( 2 ) THE question which we have to decide is whether the benefit of Section 12, Limitation Act is available to the applicant in this case. It is clear that there is no provision in regard to this matter contained in the Sales Tax Act. All that it lays down is that such an application, as this must be made within " thirty days of such refusal. " Learned counsel has, however, contended that the general provision contained in the Limitation Act--Section 29 (2) (a)--read in the light of the provision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.