SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 26

SANKAR SARAN, MUSHTAQ AHMAD
TAJPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GANGA SAHAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.MUKHERJEE, M.B.Bhatnagar, PRAKAS NARAIN SHARMA

MUSHTAQ AHMAD, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these are appeals by the applicants in a case under Section 12, U. P. Agriculturists Relief act XXVII [27] of 1934.

( 2 ) THE appellants applied under the said section for redemption of a usufructuary mortgage dated 10. 7. 1928 made by their father Tikam Singh in favour of one Ganga Sahai, the original respondent, after whose death his legal representatives were brought on the record. The mortgage was for Rs. 6,337 and was executed to pay off a decree No. 140 of 1926 of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Bulandshahr, which had been passed on foot of a simple mortgage bond dated 4-11-1920, executed by the same mortgagor in favour of the same mortgagee. This earlier mortgage too had been executed in lieu of amounts due on certain promissory notes of previous dates.

( 3 ) THE appellants case was that the entire mortgage money had been paid off from the usufruct of the property, whereas the mortgagee pleaded that a sum of Rs. 5059-9-7 was still due on that account from the present appellants as their rate able share of liability under the mortgage sought to be redeemed.

( 4 ) THE question of the appellants rate able liability was raised in view of certain






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top