SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 77

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
INDERCHAND HARI RAM – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX AND C. P. AND BERAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.SARAN, G.S.PATHAK, J.Swarup

V. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THESE two references arise out of the assessment of the same assessee Messrs. Inderchand Hari ram, Gorakhpur, in respect of two different assessment years, viz. , 1940-41 and 1941-42. Since the question, that arose, was common to both the references, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, allahabad, made one consolidated order of reference and, by it, referred the following question to this Court for opinion:

"whether, in the circumstances of the case, the income derived by the applicant firm both as managing and Sole Agents of Messrs. Shankar Sugar Mills, Limited, Captainganj, Gorakhpur, was rightly assessed under Section 10 or whether the income is assessable under Section 7 of the indian Income-tax Act?"

( 2 ) THE facts relating to these references, as given in the statement of the case, are that the assessee is a firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, having come into existence through a deed of partnership which mentioned that it was being constituted with a view to floating a private limited company to be called the Shankar Sugar Mills, Limited with a capital of 13 lacs out of which a sum of 12 lacs of rupees was to be subscribed by the partners ac

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top