SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 56

P.L.BHARGAVA
RAMNATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.KIRTY, B.N.SAPRU

P. L. BHARGAVA, J.


( 1 ) THIS is an application in revision, which is directed against an order, dated 3-11-1950, made by a Magistrate of the first class of Pargana Rath, in the district of Hamirpur, and confirmed on appeal by the learned Sessions Judge of Hamirpur. The facts and circumstances which have given rise to this revision are these :

( 2 ) AS against the applicant, Ramnath, and certain other person, proceedings under Section 107, criminal P. C. , were pending in the Court of the Magistrate. In connection with the said proceedings, the applicant appeared in the Magistrates Court. It is said that when the applicant appeared before the Court he was "badly drunk and could not control himself" and that "he was talking irrelevant thereby causing insult and interruption to the Courts work. " The Magistrate being of the opinion that the applicant had by his conduct and behaviour committed contempt of court, punishable under Section 228, Penal Code, took cognizance of the offence under Section 480, Criminal P. C. He immediately served upon the applicant a notice calling upon him to show cause, why proceedings for contempt of Court, be not taken against him. In the notice, it was st





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top