BIND BASNI PRASAD, GURTU
A. CRACKNELL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution by one Mrs. A. Cracknell directed against the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Collector of Meerut and the Court of Wards arising under the following circumstances.
( 2 ) THE petitioner is the owner of what was formerly known as Dasna estate comprising of about twenty three thousand bighas in the district of Meerut spread over nine villages. Her complaint is that
"without any notice, warning or any opportunity to show cause, and without any hearing or any reference of any kind whatsoever to the petitioner, the Court of Wards, at the instance of the collector, Meerut, assumed superintendence of her estate on the morning of 5th September, 1951. "
The notification dated 10-9-1951 published in the U. P. Gazette dated 15-9-1951 in Part I-A at page 601 shows that the superintendence of the estate has been taken over under Clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 8, U. P. Court of Wards Act, 1912. The petitioners suggestion is that her mother Mrs. A Coppinger is against her, as she wanted the petitioner to be her "unpaid companion, house-keeper and manager" and was opposed to the petitioners marriage to anyo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.