SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 160

BEG
DULLA – Appellant
Versus
STATE THROUGH DWARKA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
FAROOK HASAN

BEG, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a reference by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Unnao recommending that the order passed by Sri Niaz Ulla, bub-Divisional Magistrate, Hasanganj Unnao, under Section 145, criminal P. C. , directing that the disputed property be released in favour of the opposite parties dwarka and others be set aside.

( 2 ) IT would appear that the applicant Dulia had presented an application under Section 145, criminal P. C. , against Dwarka and others in respect of plot no. 138 detailed therein alleging that the plot in question was his tenancy land and that he was in possession of it. After calling for a police report the trial Court passed an order on 13-11-1950, that the said plot and the crop standing thereon be attached. Both the parties were called upon to file written statements in the case. Each of them claimed to be the tenant in possession of the plot in dispute. They were required to produce evidence in support of their case.

( 3 ) THE learned Magistrate minutely examined the evidence adduced by each of the parties and as a result of the findings thus arrived at on their respective claims and on the question of possession finally passed an order releasing t






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top