SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 137

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
PRATAP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S.PATHAK, GOPALJI MEHROTRA

Y. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 66 (l), Income-tax Act, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal has referred the following questions to us for answer :

Q. 1--Whether income from the sale of forest trees of spontaneous growth, growing on land which is assessed to land revenue, is agricultural income within the meaning of Section 2 (1) (a), Income-tax Act and as such exempt from income-tax under Section 4 (3) (viii) of the Act ? q. 2--Whether the assesees net receipts from the sale of forest trees were the assessses income liable to income-tax and not merely capital converted into cash?"

( 2 ) AS regards the second question, it was the assessees own case that the forest was being worked for, at least, some time on scientific lines in accordance with a scheme of making profit, there was a regular working plan and the assessee was deriving regular income from the forest and spending money to increase the profit. It was in view of these admissions that Shri Pathak had to concede that the answer to this question must be in the affirmative, i. e. , that the net receipts on the sale of forest trees were the assessees income liable to income-tax and were not merely capital con




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top