SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 281

MALIK, V. BHARGAVA
COMMR. OF INCOME-TAX, U. P. AND C. P. AND BERAR, LUCKNOW – Appellant
Versus
I. D. VARSHANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.C.Das, S.N.KATJU


( 1 ) ON an application under Section 66 (1) of the Income-tax Act made by the Commissioner of income-tax, U. P. , C. P. and Berar, the Appellate Income-tax Tribunals Allahabad, referred to this Court a question of law for its decision on 16-12-1943. The assessee, Mr. I. D. Varshani, was an individual. While the reference was pending the assessee died and it is admitted that death took place on 10-12-1948. In the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the three sons of the assessee detailed facts are given to show that the Income-tax Officer, Kanpur Circle, was informed of Mr. Varshanis death and in subsequent years the sons of the deceased were assessed to Income-tax. The reference was put up before a Bench of this Court for hearing on 13-9-1949, when Mr. S. N. Katju, learned counsel for the assessee, stated that his client had died on 10-12-1948. The Court directed that

"the Commissioner of Income-tax should make an application within one month, giving the names of the legal representatives of the deceased to whom notice may be issued. "

The Commissioner, however, did not furnish the information asked for with the result that the legal representatives of the deceased assessee could












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top