SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 273

V.BHARGAVA, CHATURVEDI
SUNDAR LAL SAXENA – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTAN COMMERCIAL BANK LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ganga Pd.Khare

V. BHARGAVA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a petition for issue of a writ of certiorari under Article 226 of the Constitution.


( 2 ) THE petitioner was employed as a sub-agent at the Kanpur main office of the Hindustan commercial Bank, Ltd. This main office was different from the head office of the Bank. On 6-10-1947, the petitioner was suspended by the Bank. The dispute relating to this suspension was placed by the U. P. Bank Employees Union before the U. P. Government which, under Section 3, industrial Disputes Act, 1947, referred it for decision to an adjudicator. The adjudicator held the petitioner to be a workman and gave an award declaring that the petitioner was entitled to the withdrawal of the order of suspension and further that he was entitled to his full salary with all allowances, except the conveyance allowance, and all privileges with regard to the provident fund, leave bonus etc. , during his period of suspension. This award was enforced and the petitioner was re-employed by the Bank. He was paid all his duos, except the amounts which accrued to him as annual increments in salary and the consequential increase in the dear food allowance. Certain other relief arising out of an aw






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top