SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(All) 244

CHATURVEDI
BHAGWATI PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
SHITALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hirday Nath Seth, MAN SINGH, VISHWANATH SINGH

CHATURVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a defendants application in revision arising out of an application under Section 12, agriculturists Relief Act. The learned counsel for the plaintiffs opposite parties, Mr. Bishwanath singh has very frankly conceded that this application must be allowed, because the properties sought to be redeemed are certain occupancy plots. A Full Bench case of this Court has ruled that an application under Section 12, Agriculturists Relief Act is not maintainable for redemption of a mortgage of occupancy plots. This Full Bench case is reported in -- mahabal singh v. Ram Raj, 1950 All LJ 713 (FB ).

( 2 ) I, accordingly, allow this application in revision, set aside the decrees of the Courts below and dismiss the suit. In view of the peculiar circumstances of the case, I direct that the parties shall bear their own costs in all the Courts.


.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top